United States v. Michael Patrick Quigley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although the court erred in admitting drug courier profile testimony, such error was harmless
• \point by point examination of profile characteristics with specific reference to [the defendant] constitutes use of the profile not as background ... but as substantive evidence that [the defendant] fits the profile\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).