United States v. Michael Krzyzaniak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant is precluded from challenging the application of Guidelines calculations to which he agreed in his plea agreement
• reviewing for plain error when defendant did not object at sentencing to adequacy of explanation of sentence
• reviewing for plain error when the defendant did not object and considering the whole sentencing record
• relying on “[tjhe court’s subsequent written Statement of Reasons” to find that there was no plain error in its explanation of reasons for rejecting the defendant’s request for a downward variance
• “The court’s explanation is sufficient if the sentencing record taken as a whole demonstrates that the court considered the relevant factors.”
• “Failure to make a timely objection that gives the district court an opportunity to correct any deficiency should waive, not merely forfeit, the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).