United States v. Michael John Hanno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, without regard to evidence of defendant's guilt, district court's improper dismissal of jurors was prejudicial
• holding that, without regard to evidence of defendant’s guilt, district court’s improper dismissal of jurors was prejudicial
• “Considering that an accused has the constitutional right to be present at his jury selection, we think we has the same right to be present at the dismemberment of a jury which previously had been selected in his presence.”
• “Considering that an accused has the constitutional right to be present at his jury selection, we think we has the same right to be present at the dismemberment of a jury which previously had been selected in his presence.”
• reading Rule 51 to require a \meaningful opportunity to make a con- temporaneous objection\
• reading Rule 51 to require a \meaningful opportunity to make a con- temporaneous objection\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).