Skip to main content
· 7/20/1993

United States v. Michael Joe Taylor, United States of America v. Chardale Arnaz Bowe, United States of America v. Eric Lamont Hutchinson

Citations

  • 997 F.2d 1551
  • 302 U.S. App. D.C. 349
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a District Court need not give any definition of reasonable doubt at all\
  • pointing out that ordinarily, a judge may be best advised to attempt no definition of reasonable doubt unless the jury requests it because experience has shown that doing so “add[s] little in the way of clarity and often add[s] much in the way of confusion and controversy”
  • “the court’s instruction on reasonable doubt did not lessen the prosecution’s burden of proof and was not in error because there is no reasonable likelihood that the jury applied the challenged instruction in a way that violates the Constitution”
  • interpreting Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 28 (Federal Judicial Ctr. 1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.