United States v. Michael Jerome Zimmer, United States of America v. James Clarence Stoltz, United States of America v. Aaron Dale Carver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of an amended version of the Guidelines to a conspiracy which continues both before and after the amendment does not violate the ex post facto clause
• holding defendant responsible for drug quantity distributed by coconspirators while defendant was incarcerated
• discussing when, in drug conspiracy cases, the district court may attribute to the defendant drug quantities from transactions in which the defendant was not directly involved
• management or supervision of only one other participant or one transaction suffices for organizing role enhancement
• “The district court applied the otherwise applicable adjusted base offense level of 40 and not the applicable career offender offense level of 37.”
• “The district court applied the otherwise applicable adjusted base offense level of 40 and not the applicable career offender offense level of 37.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).