Skip to main content
· 3/10/1993

United States v. Michael James Sandsness

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 970
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 3172
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1767
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290
  • 1993 WL 63033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining vague statutes lack a “core” of clearly prohibited conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Noonan, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.