United States v. Michael J. Timley, Lacey M. Gimlin, United States of America v. Michael J. Timley, United States of America v. Michael J. Timley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “two trash pulls, conducted within a week of one another, ... which yielded small and large bags containing marijuana and residue” were sufficient to establish probable cause to search a residence
• holding that a third party’s claim, which vested after the conspiracy ended, did “not give him a legal right to money that was derived from a drug conspiracy that began before that date”
• holding that, while a warrant’s authority to search may have been over- broad, any failure to suppress the seized evidence was harmless because the warrant was sufficient “as to items seized that formed the basis for the criminal charges”
• holding that “two trash pulls, conducted within a week of one another, . . . which yielded small and large bags containing marijuana and residue” were sufficient to establish probable cause to search a residence
• holding that, while a warrant’s authority to search may have been overbroad, any failure to suppress the seized evidence was harmless because the warrant was sufficient “as to items seized that formed the basis for the criminal charges”
• finding valid a warrant authorizing the seizure of “equipment used to further drug transactions, documents relating to drug transactions ... and photographs of coconspirators or objects of the conspiracy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).