United States v. Michael J. Grasso, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “‘proceeds,’ as that term is used in the money laundering statute, means gross receipts [from illegal activity] rather than profits”
• holding that “proceeds,’ as that term is used in the money laundering statue, means gross receipts [from illegal activity] rather that profits”
• arguing that Scialabba reached an “incorrect result” and that “proceeds” means “simply gross receipts from illegal activity”
• finding that proceeds are gross receipts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).