United States v. Michael I. Blumenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intent to deceive is not a necessary element of section 1014
• affirming the lower court's refusal to give jury instructions on the bank officers' collusion with the defendant; the instructions did not advance a \legally sound\ theory
• rejecting the defendant’s argument that he 2 lacked the requisite intent to deceive because he had the oral consent of the bank officer to submit 3 false statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).