United States v. Michael Giltner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error where the defendant did not request a continuance to prepare a rebuttal to hearsay information provided by the government
• “the sole interest being protected at sentencing is the right not to be sentenced on the basis of inaccurate or unreliable information.”
• \It is widely recognized that the sole interest being protected at sentencing is the right not to be sentenced on the basis of inaccurate or unreliable information.\
• “[W]e affirm the district court’s discretion to control the form of the rebuttal to challenged information.”
• “It is within the discretion of the district judge to determine the kinds and form of information it will consider” at sentencing.
• mandatory minimum sentence not applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).