United States v. Michael Gelfuso, Peter John Milano and Luigi Gelfuso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting case-by-case analysis 22 and declining to express a “view as to the point at which detention in a particular case might become excessively prolonged and violate due process”
• “We consider the length of confinement in conjunction with the extent to which the prosecution bears responsibility for the delay that has ensued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).