United States v. Michael Eugene Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the funds trans-ferred in the S 1957 counts were criminally derived property at the time they were deposited in accounts under[the defendant's] control\
• holding that money laundering involves “funds obtained from prior, separate criminal activity”
• finding that for purposes of § 1957, where proceeds derived from mail fraud were deposited into accounts, it was irrelevant that these accounts were not in defendant’s name, since defendant exercised control over the accounts
• affirming subsection 3B1.1(a) adjustment where defendant \orchestrated the efforts\ of other participants
• predicate offenses of domestic mail fraud and wire fraud were complete “at the point at which Savage ... mailed the promotional information or wired the money in the United States”
• predicate offenses of domestic mail fraud and wire fraud were complete \at the point at which Savage . . . mailed the promotional information or wired the money in the United States\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).