United States v. Michael Eugene Pharis, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant did not engage in sexual abuse of a minor because he did not make physical contact with a child
• looking to the defendant’s offense conduct—exposing his genital area to children—rather than the title of the statute violated—child molestation—in determining whether the defendant had engaged in sexual abuse or exploitation
• discussing physical sexual contact as sexual abuse or exploitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).