United States v. Michael Edward Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding implied consent to mistrial despite defendant’s expression of displeasure at possibly retrying the case because defendant did not make an express objection and “implied his consent to the retrial by failing to object to the mistrial and by rescheduling the new trial”
• “Because there is no evidence that the prosecutor intended to terminate the first trial, there is no double jeopardy bar to Nichols’ retrial.”
• if there is no evidence that the prosecutor intended to terminate the first trial, there is no double jeopardy bar
• “Because there is no evidence that the prosecutor intended to terminate the first trial, there is no double jeopardy bar to Nichols’ retrial.”
• “Because there is no evidence that the prosecutor intended to terminate the first trial, there is no double jeopardy bar to Nichols’ retrial.”
• “Because there is no evidence that the prosecutor intended to terminate the first trial, there is no double jeopardy bar to Nichols’ retrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).