Second Circuit· 8/7/1978

United States v. Michael E. Quinto

Citations

582 F.2d 224
3 Fed. R. Serv. 1097
47 A.L.R. Fed. 621
42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5601
1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that without the wrongly admitted interview memorandum, “[although Wallwork testified that Quinto had made [] a crucial admission, the jury might not have credited the agent’s in-court testimony”
describing the introduction of written consistent statements as “[t]he government witnesses in effect accompanying] the jury into the jury room.”
“Inasmuch as we agree with Quinto that the district court erred by admitting the memorandum as a prior consistent statement under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingraham, Mansfield, Waterman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.