United States v. Michael E. Quinto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that without the wrongly admitted interview memorandum, “[although Wallwork testified that Quinto had made [] a crucial admission, the jury might not have credited the agent’s in-court testimony”
• describing the introduction of written consistent statements as “[t]he government witnesses in effect accompanying] the jury into the jury room.”
• “Inasmuch as we agree with Quinto that the district court erred by admitting the memorandum as a prior consistent statement under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).