United States v. Michael DeMarco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Fed. R. Evid. 608(b) allows proof of specific instances of conduct to establish bias or prior inconsistent statement
• noting that Fed. R. Evid. 608(b) allows proof of specific instances of conduct to establish bias or prior inconsistent statement
• extrinsic evidence of witness’s prior statement is admissible pursuant to Rule 613(b) for 1 Rule 613(b
• extrinsic evidence of witness's prior statement is admissible pursuant to Rule 613(b) for purpose of impeaching witness so long as witness has first been given opportunity to explain or deny statement
• “Suarez denied making the statement to Agent McCune. Pursuant to Rule 613(b), DeMarco was then entitled to elicit testimony from Agent McCune regarding Suarez’s prior inconsistent statements in order to perfect impeachment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).