Eighth Circuit· 2/5/1996
United States v. Michael Dean Byrd
Citations
- 76 F.3d 194
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1515
- 1996 WL 41601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court may consider even “unrelated criminal conduct in denying an acceptance[-]of[-]responsibility reduction”
- upholding denial of acceptance of responsibility where defendant used marijuana while awaiting a sentence for assault with a dangerous weapon
- § 3E1.1 does not preclude sentencing judge, in exercise of discretion, from considering unlawful conduct unrelated to offense of conviction in determining whether defendant qualifies for acceptance reduction
- § 3E1.1 does not preclude consideration of unlawful conduct unrelated to offense of conviction in determining whether defendant qualifies for acceptance-of-responsibility adjustment; such conduct could shed light on sincerity of defendant’s claims of remorse
- “Guideline § 3E1.1 does not preclude the sentencing judge . . . from considering unlawful conduct unrelated to the offense of conviction in determining whether a defendant qualifies for an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.”
- defendant bears burden of proof concerning acceptance of responsibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Loken, Schwarzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. FlucasFifth Circuit· 1996-10-25· cited 83×
- United States v. Angelo P. CeccaraniThird Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 75×
- United States v. Richard William Field, Also Known as Mike FieldEighth Circuit· 1997-04-07· cited 74×
- United States v. LagasseFirst Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 45×
- United States v. James Earl AtlasEighth Circuit· 1996-10-29· cited 45×
- United States v. Nam Xuan NgoEighth Circuit· 1997-12-30· cited 41×
- United States v. PrinceTenth Circuit· 2000-02-18· cited 28×
- United States v. McLaughlinFirst Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 23×
- Tammy Peters v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 2006-10-06· cited 22×
- United States v. Delwin CooperEighth Circuit· 2021-05-25· cited 18×
- United States v. Jeffrey Brian MartinezEighth Circuit· 2000-12-12· cited 14×
- United States v. FiorellaN.D. Iowa· 2009-02-11· cited 14×
- United States v. Joan Valentine Mohamed, Also Known as Joan Valentine and Joan Valentine KerrEighth Circuit· 1998-11-18· cited 10×
- United States v. NguyenN.D. Iowa· 2002-05-17· cited 4×
- United States v. ElmardoudiN.D. Iowa· 2008-03-12· cited 2×
- United States v. WaldnerN.D. Iowa· 2008-07-07· cited 2×
- United States v. HigginsSeventh Circuit· 2004-01-16· cited 1×
- United States v. James Earl AtlasEighth Circuit· 1996-08-26
- United States v. Richard W. FieldEighth Circuit· 1997-04-07
- United States v. Clark Beach FieldEighth Circuit· 1997-04-07
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsEleventh Circuit· 1989-07-31· cited 201×
- United States v. Dana Ray MorrisonSixth Circuit· 1993-01-12· cited 149×
- United States v. HammerEighth Circuit· 1993-08-23· cited 109×
- Joshua Basin Partnership v. United States Department of the InteriorSupreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 83×
- United States v. Kurt W. McDonaldSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 74×
- United States v. Kenneth Ray WatkinsFifth Circuit· 1990-08-27· cited 68×
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilFirst Circuit· 1991-06-19· cited 59×
- United States v. Frank SkorniakEighth Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 47×
- United States v. Dane Clark CourtneyFifth Circuit· 1992-11-25· cited 30×
- Skorniak v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 26×
- Colon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-05-30· cited 23×
- United States v. Michael Eugene PoplawskiEighth Circuit· 1995-01-26· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.