United States v. Michael David Blazek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s contention that the evidence of enticement was insufficient because the government agent enticed him to commit the offense
• rejecting argument that Rules 413–415 do “not apply because [defendant] was not charged with an ‘offense of sexual assault’” where the “instant offense involve[d] conduct” described in Rule 413(d)
• “At trial … the government introduced evidence of his 1997 conviction for Abusive Sexual Contact with a Minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(1).”
• prior misconduct was admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 413, despite the conduct actually being prosecuted under a state statute not incorporated into the rule, because the underlying conduct was prohibited by an incorporated statute
• describing a fifteen-month exchange with an undercover agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).