Skip to main content
· 8/28/1995

United States v. Michael Daniels

Citations

  • 64 F.3d 311
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24315
  • 1995 WL 507296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A defendant is not entitled to a hearing when he does not make even the barest of cases that an expert is necessary to his defense.”
  • probable cause established when three witnesses selected a suspect’s photo out of a photo array but stated they could not be sure without seeing him in person
  • “Expert testimony regarding the potential hazards' of eyewitness identifications will not aid the jury because it addresses an issue of which the jury is already aware, and it will not contribute to their understanding of the particular factual issue posed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manion, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.