Skip to main content
· 3/31/1982

United States v. Michael D. Williams

Citations

  • 674 F.2d 310
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1436
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that court's purported error was not type of \mistake\ that would justify clause (1) relief
  • concluding that court's purported error was not type of “mistake” that would justify clause (1) relief
  • concluding that court's purported error was not type of \mistake\ that would justify clause (1) relief
  • holding that relief is not authorized where the Rule 60(b) motion is “nothing more than a request that the district court change its mind”
  • noting that a motion requesting the court to change its mind is not authorized under Rule 60(b)
  • explaining that when a Rule 60(b) motion is “nothing more than a request that the district court change its mind,” it is not authorized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Ervin, Chapman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.