Skip to main content
· 6/23/2004

United States v. Michael C. Antonelli

Citations

  • 371 F.3d 360
  • 2004 WL 1240592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that courts should look to the substance, not the label, of a pro se filing to determine its character
  • referring to three-strikes provision as one of several procedural constraints under the PLRA
  • referring to three‐ strikes provision as one of several procedural constraints un‐ der the PLRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Per Curiam, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.