United States v. Michael Busic, United States of America v. Anthony La Rocca, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, in a case in which the defendant claimed error because inference against the government was not authorized, that the government's non-production could be explained by the fact that the testimony was unnecessary given the evidence adduced and the burden of proof
• “calculations that a witness may help a lot but hurt a little may compel restraint when counsel believes that his burden is already met”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).