United States v. Michael Arrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b)’s command that “the court shall . . . grant a prompt hearing” unless the movant’s claim is “conclusively” undermined by the record
• “A movant need not ‘prove’ anything to warrant a hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dominique Wallace v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-08-05· cited 33×
• United States v. Judy Haisten
  Third Circuit· 2022-10-05· cited 2×
• United States v. Torey Dobbin
  Third Circuit· 2025-08-11
• Nita Patel v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2025-10-17
• United States v. Aaron Lyons
  Third Circuit· 2026-04-28

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Lisa Michelle Lambert v. Charlotte Blackwell, Mrs., Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
  Third Circuit· 1998-01-26· cited 529×
• United States v. Donald Teague
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-02-26· cited 386×
• United States v. Brian Booth
  Third Circuit· 2005-12-29· cited 245×
• United States v. Courtney Dave Pennycooke Courtney Pennycooke
  Third Circuit· 1995-08-30· cited 121×
• United States v. Marcresse McCoy A/K/A Mark Shinne A/K/A Mark Chin A/K/A Jerron McCoy Marcresse McCoy
  Third Circuit· 2005-06-06· cited 74×
• United States v. Lonnie Dawson
  Third Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 64×
• United States v. Michael Begin
  Third Circuit· 2012-10-09· cited 62×
• United States v. Regina Tolliver
  Third Circuit· 2015-09-01· cited 58×
• Saranchak v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
  Third Circuit· 2015-09-14· cited 38×
• United States v. Michael Scripps
  Third Circuit· 2020-06-10· cited 34×
• United States v. Kenneth Wines
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-08-15· cited 28×