United States v. Michael Anthony Madrid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the application of this body of law in competency proceedings (citations omitted)
• “Thus, the statements made by the defendant during the Rule 12.2(c) examination were admissible at trial as a basis for the expert’s opinion on the issue of sanity.”
• expert’s testimony, coupled with that of lay witnesses who observed the defendant at the scene of the robbery and “planning the robbery in advance,” was sufficient for a jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).