· 5/4/2004
United States v. Michael A. Thomas
Citations
- 367 F.3d 194
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8734
- 2004 WL 943763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the factual basis “may be established from anything that appears on the record” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “A statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the statute necessarily would violate the [District’s] statute as well.”
- “A statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the statute necessarily would violate the [District’s] statute as well.”
- a case involving Maryland and Virginia driving while intoxicated statutes, declaring “[a] statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the [out-of-state Maryland] statute necessarily would violate the Virginia statute as well” (citation omitted)
- a case involving Maryland and Virginia driving while intoxicated statutes, declaring “[a] statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the [out-of-state Maryland] statute necessarily would violate the Virginia statute as well” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Motz, Traxler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.