Skip to main content
· 5/4/2004

United States v. Michael A. Thomas

Citations

  • 367 F.3d 194
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8734
  • 2004 WL 943763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the factual basis “may be established from anything that appears on the record” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “A statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the statute necessarily would violate the [District’s] statute as well.”
  • “A statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the statute necessarily would violate the [District’s] statute as well.”
  • a case involving Maryland and Virginia driving while intoxicated statutes, declaring “[a] statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the [out-of-state Maryland] statute necessarily would violate the Virginia statute as well” (citation omitted)
  • a case involving Maryland and Virginia driving while intoxicated statutes, declaring “[a] statute is substantially similar if any actions violating the [out-of-state Maryland] statute necessarily would violate the Virginia statute as well” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Motz, Traxler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.