Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/1/1999

United States v. Mett

Citations

  • 178 F.3d 1058
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 5187
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4083
  • 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1081
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11124
  • 1999 WL 343730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that state law determines the appropriate standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Singleton, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.