Skip to main content
· 7/15/1834

United States v. Mertz

Citations

  • 2 Watts 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • which was concerned with the effect of G. L. c. 152, § 15, prior to the amendment thereof by St. 1929, c. 326, § 1, which added the provision for discontinuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.