· 11/21/1966
United States v. Menk
Citations
- 260 F. Supp. 784
- 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that cruise ship’s claim of prejudice “appears to be speculative; [cruise ship] has not carried the burden to justify delayed production of the videos”
- “[M]aterials or documents drafted or created in the ordinary course of business are not protected.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steckler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.