United States v. Melvin Peter Kings, A/k/a, Comffort, Peter Onyema Penn, Neteson Golden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fact that statutory maximum of one count was within total punishment range did not prohibit court from imposing another consecutive sentence because the total sentence was less than the maximum total punishment
• offense level did not adequately recognize seriousness of defendant’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).