Skip to main content
· 10/25/1978

United States v. Melvin L. Schutterle and Martha E. Schutterle

Citations

  • 586 F.2d 1201
  • 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6077
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issuance of summons one year before agent recommended prosecution \precludes any inference\ that summons violates LaSalle
  • “Absent a protectible liberty or property interest, the protections of procedural due process do not attach. The Schutterles clearly have no property interest in the business records of the bank.”
  • “Absent a protectible liberty or property interest, the protections of procedural due process do not attach. The Schutterles clearly have no property interest in the business records of the bank.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Stephenson, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.