United States v. Melvin J. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that instructions adequately placed the question of materiality before the jury even though the instructions did not explicitly use the term \materiality\
• affirming conviction and finding sufficient evidence of materiality “[b]ecause [de- fendant]’s false statements regarding his financial condition could clearly influence a bank deciding whether to approve a loan (even if they did not in fact influence the decision)”
• affirming conviction and finding sufficient evidence of materiality “[b]ecause [de- fendant]’s false statements regarding his financial condition could clearly influence a bank deciding whether to approve a loan (even if they did not in fact influence the decision)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).