Skip to main content
· 8/28/2002

United States v. Melissa Harris

Citations

  • 302 F.3d 72
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17881
  • 2002 WL 1981395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating a restitution order under the VWPA where the district court failed to affirmatively demonstrate that it had considered the defendant’s ability to pay
  • district court's assertion that it read the presentence report will not suffice because it does not indicate the report's contents were considered
  • district court’s assertion that it read the presentence report will not suffice because it does not indicate the report’s contents were considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Winter, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.