· 8/28/2002
United States v. Melissa Harris
Citations
- 302 F.3d 72
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17881
- 2002 WL 1981395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating a restitution order under the VWPA where the district court failed to affirmatively demonstrate that it had considered the defendant’s ability to pay
- district court's assertion that it read the presentence report will not suffice because it does not indicate the report's contents were considered
- district court’s assertion that it read the presentence report will not suffice because it does not indicate the report’s contents were considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Graafeiland, Winter, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.