United States v. Melgoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreted the amended federal rules as prohibiting a defendant’s request to plead guilty by video teleconferencing, but did not address the constitutionality of such a procedure
• interpreted the amended federal rules as prohibiting a defendant’s request to plead guilty by video teleconferencing, but did not address the constitutionality of such a procedure
• denying Defendants’ motions to enter pleas by video conference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).