Eighth Circuit· 3/16/2012
United States v. Meirick
Citations
- 674 F.3d 802
- 2012 WL 878464
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider a substantive due process challenge to sentencing determinations that was “cognizable more properly as a challenge to the reasonableness of his sentence” (quoting United States v. Villareal-Amarillas, 562 F.3d 892, 898 (8th Cir. 2009))
- “It is within the legislative prerogative to determine, for example, whether child pornography offenses should See, e.g., OCGA § 16-6-3 (c) (statutory rape
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Bright, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Amina AliEighth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 50×
- United States v. Guy WheelockEighth Circuit· 2014-11-20· cited 20×
- Lora Walker v. Hartford Life and Accident InsEighth Circuit· 2016-08-02· cited 14×
- United States v. Larry CooneyEighth Circuit· 2017-11-13· cited 9×
- United States v. KonnSecond Circuit· 2015-12-17· cited 4×
- Regan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-11-02· cited 4×
- United States v. Keith AthertonNinth Circuit· 2024-07-03· cited 3×
- United States v. AustinM.D. Tennessee· 2018-07-16
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- United States v. John Robert AndisEighth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 1,174×
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-03-02· cited 814×
- United States v. Eric Brittman, United States of America v. Eric BrittmanEighth Circuit· 1989-06-09· cited 90×
- United States v. Villareal-AmarillasEighth Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 63×
- United States v. Ann Victoria EllefsonEighth Circuit· 2005-08-23· cited 44×
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. WILLIAM MICHAEL FORTNEY, —Eighth Circuit· 2004-02-06· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.