United States v. Meirick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider a substantive due process challenge to sentencing determinations that was “cognizable more properly as a challenge to the reasonableness of his sentence” (quoting United States v. Villareal-Amarillas, 562 F.3d 892, 898 (8th Cir. 2009))
• “It is within the legislative prerogative to determine, for example, whether child pornography offenses should See, e.g., OCGA § 16-6-3 (c) (statutory rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).