United States v. Mei Keng Lam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exception under § 2511(2)(d) inapplicable where codefendant recorded conversations “as a means of keeping business records for his unlawful gambling activities” and it was undisputed that the recordings were made for “an unlawful purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).