United States v. Medunjanin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that defendant did not clearly and unambiguously invoke the right to counsel when, before receiving Miranda warnings, defendant asked officers whether his lawyer had been notified that a search warrant had been executed against him
• “[A] person who wishes to enjoy his constitutional protection against self-incrimination must invoke the privilege—either generally or vis-à-vis a specific question—at the time he is asked to respond or make a statement.” (emphasis added)
• “[A] person who wishes to enjoy his constitutional protection against self- incrimination must invoke the privilege–either generally or vis-à-vis a specific question– 12 at the time he is asked to respond or make a statement.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).