United States v. McNealy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding \potentially available\ exculpatory evidence \should be considered 'potentially useful evidence' rather than 'material exculpatory evidence.' \
• determining that stated reason for continuance of more trial preparation and statement that district court weighed continuance against the defendant’s and public's interests in a speedy trial were sufficient to exclude continuance from 70-day time period
• \The Government presented exhibits of the images themselves and evidence of how McNealy obtained the images....\
• three-month delay between granting continuance and setting trial date was justified when defense counsel was attending National Guard training until shortly before the trial date was set
• restrictions on a defense expert’s ability to possess child pornography do not violate the fair trial rights of defendant
• describing the standard as “highly deferential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).