United States v. McENRY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government waived an argument it failed to raise in its answering brief
• concluding that the government waived an argument by failing to raise it in its answering brief
• concluding the government waived an argument by failing to raise it in its answering brief
• treating an argument that the government failed to raise in its answering brief as waived
• reviewing “de novo the district court’s interpretation of the sentencing guidelines”
• when the government does not make argu- ment that “was available at the time it filed its answering brief . . . [it] has waived that argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).