United States v. McClellon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “evidence of the existence, the terms, and the witness’s understanding of a plea or witness immunity agreement is not vouching”
• concluding there was sufficient evidence that a defendant possessed drugs, in part based on testimony that he sold drugs out of the same room where the drugs were found
• relying in part on testimony describing defendant’s sale of controlled substances in a bedroom as evidence of constructive possession
• relying in part on testimony of defendant’s “past conduct in selling drugs” as probative of intent to distribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).