United States v. Maynard Charles Campbell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the term \during flight\ applied to a defendant who had barricaded himself inside a house and engaged in a twelve-hour armed standoff with police
• applying the enhancement to a defendant who armed and barricaded himself inside a house for twelve hours and threatened to kill officers
• limiting review of the jury instructions to plain error where the defendant did not object to the jury instructions in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 30, even though the defendant did submit alternate instructions
• “In the absence of objection, it was not plain error for the district court to use [the Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury] instructions.”
• \We do not subtract the costs of pulling off the caper when we calculate the value of the stolen property.\
• “Plain error is error that is clear under the law and that affects substantial rights. [The defendant] has the burden to establish that the error was prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).