United States v. Maxine Forrest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “. . . the evidence must be strong, clear, convincing and direct. Where the government seeks to establish perjury by the testimony of one witness and corroborating evidence, the latter must be independent of the former and inconsistent with the innocence of the defendant.”
• ‘ . . . the evidence must be strong, clear, convincing and direct. Where the government seeks to establish perjury by the testimony of one witness and corroborating evidence, the latter must be independent of the former and inconsistent with the innocence of the defendant.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sanchez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-21· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Coleman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-08-12· cited 8×
• United States v. Tunstall
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-07-13· cited 4×
• State v. Crotty
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-01-31· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weiler v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1945-01-29· cited 290×
• United States v. William Henry Forrest and Maxine Forrest
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-07-03· cited 121×
• Eldred J. Paternostro v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1962-12-27· cited 112×
• United States v. Neff
  Third Circuit· 1954-04-01· cited 91×
• UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold FREEDMAN, Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1971-07-06· cited 47×
• United States v. William Henry Forrest
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-08-14· cited 43×
• McWhorter v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1952-01-31· cited 34×
• United States v. Marvin Maultasch and Richard D. Reddock
  Second Circuit· 1979-02-22· cited 21×
• Emeterio Cuesta, Also Known as Emeterio Cuesta Campillo v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1956-03-07· cited 8×