United States v. Maurice William Campbell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a district court must support its loss calculation with reliable and specific ev- idence
• rejecting argument “that all sentencing enhancements are elements . . . that a jury must decide” and reaffirming holding in Charles
• “[A] fraudster may not receive credit for value that is provided to his victims for the sole purpose of enabling him to conceal or perpetuate his scheme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).