United States v. Maupin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a no contest plea with adjudication withheld was a “conviction” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A
• holding that a nolo contendere plea to state charges for posses- sion of child pornography constituted a prior state conviction within the meaning of § 2252A(b)(1) and (2)
• a Florida noló conviction constitutes a prior “conviction” under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b), a child pornography statute that prescribes a sentencing enhancement for an individual previously convicted of a similar offense
• a Florida nolo conviction constitutes a prior “conviction” under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b), a child pornography statute that prescribes a sentencing enhancement for an individual previously convicted of a similar offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).