United States v. Mattingly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute allowing WAPA “to sue and be sued” did not waive the sovereign immunity of WAPA’s Board, and the Board is an improper party to employee’s discrimination claims
• “[T]he Court is not prohibited from deciding a motion without receiving a response; nevertheless, that is a far cry from the Court deeming that the original motion has been conceded due to the lack of a response.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).