United States v. Matthew Ianniello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he duty to investigate arises only when the party alleging misconduct makes an adequate showing of extrinsic influence to overcome the presumption of jury impartiality.\
• “The duty to investigate arises only when the party alleging misconduct makes an adequate showing of extrinsic influence to overcome the presumption of jury impartiality.”
• “[w]e are always reluctant to haul jurors in after they have reached a verdict” to probe alleged juror misconduct absent “clear, strong, substantial and incontrovertible evidence ... that a specific, non-speculative impropriety has occurred”
• “Plaintiff intends to provide the New York Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with the transcript of voir dire, which includes the general residences of each juror, so that citizenship may be verified.”
• involving juror affidavits \alleging specific acts of inappropriate conduct\
• such a hearing is to be “avoided whenever possible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).