Skip to main content
· 1/10/2007

United States v. Matthew D. Jones

Citations

  • 472 F.3d 1136
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 437
  • 2007 WL 60382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing merits of underlying argument regarding the elements of wire fraud and denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he had failed to offer a fair and just reason
  • reviewing merits of underlying argument regarding the elements of wire fraud and denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he had failed to offer a fair and just reason
  • even if defendant acted in good faith when he acquired money from investors to purchase classic cars, he committed wire fraud by keeping the money for himself and lying about how he used the money in an attempt to “avoid returning [the money] to its rightful owners”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, McKeown, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.