United States v. Mateo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where application of an Amendment to the Guidelines does not lower a defendant’s sentencing range due to his status as a career offender, a reduction of sentence is not authorized
• holding that a retroactive reduction in the Guidelines’ cocaine base offense levels does not entitle a defendant to a sentence reduction when his sentencing range was based on the alternative career offender offense level
• holding that a retroactive reduction in the Guidelines’ cocaine base offense levels does not entitle a defendant to a sentence reduction when his sentencing range was based on the 5 alternative career offender offense level
• explaining that defendant is not entitled to reduction when the amendment does not change overall Guidelines calculation
• explaining that defendant is not entitled to reduction when the amendment does not change overall Guidelines calculation
• explaining that the defendant’s career offender base offense level remained at 34, regardless of whether the otherwise applicable base offense level would be reduced under Amendment 706

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).