United States v. Maryea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining, in responding to a prejudicial variance argument, that while “knowledge of the broader conspiracy’s existence is critical,” the “government need not prove that the defendant had knowledge of every other participant, or of the details of the conspiracy”
• “This interdependence makes it reasonable to speak of a tacit understanding between [a core conspirator] and others upon whose unlawful acts his success depends.”
• “Even if a district court has found a defendant competent when the trial begins, ‘a significant change in circumstances in the midst of trial may render a second compe- tency hearing proper.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).