United States v. Mary Jane Johnson Rickey Joe Bradshaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “appellate jurisdiction is proper if the government simply certifies that the evidence suppressed is substantial proof of a material fact”
• stating mere certification by the government is enough to demonstrate the materiality of the suppressed evidence
• “[W]e need not examine whether [the suppressed evidence] would actually be substantial proof of a material fact. The government has so certified; that suffices.”
• government’s disclosure of expert six days before trial in violation of district court order untimely
• discussing the certification requirement as a jurisdictional requirement
• stating “mere certification is required to demonstrate materiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).