Skip to main content
· 8/29/1990

United States v. Mary Elizabeth De La Rosa

Citations

  • 911 F.2d 985
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15236
  • 1990 WL 124337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “clearly erroneous” standard applied
  • same test employed in plain error analysis
  • employment with church affiliated agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Davis, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.